Dear Ramji!
Our communication is so light I am I
am drowning in the light so I want to meet you in person. The understanding (that I am the Self) is
quite clear for me. Because one is what
one is, IT can’t be an experience. I
think that knowing who I am is too easy.
I think it cannot be so easy. It
must be a felt experience. Somehow I am
missing the full conviction that every thought and feeling unfolding in
consciousness is just the mind. I
somehow think they belong to me, the one who believes in thoughts and
feelings. It feels to me that if the
full conviction were there I would not indulge my thoughts any more.
Ram:
That’s right. So why isn’t the
conviction there? Perhaps the problem is
that the believer in the thoughts and feelings has not realized that the
pursuit of certain experiences and/or the cultivation of certain thoughts and
feelings will not bring lasting happiness.
I would say that he needs to come to a point where it is completely
clear that there is nothing anywhere, inwardly or outwardly, that can either
add or subtract happiness from him. In
Vedanta this is called viragya, dispassion and is based on viveka,
discrimination. Such a person has lived
enough life to know that whatever experience brings is limited and will
therefore not set one free. So this type
of person stops chasing experience in any form…including the so-called
spiritual experiences. Even if you have
a powerful spiritual experience, it always fades, leaving you feeling limited
and incomplete once more.
In Vivekachoodamani and elsewhere
Shankara says that viragya is one of the most important qualifications of
enlightenment. It means you do not care
one way or the other what experience brings.
You are happy when you feel good and you are happy when you feel
bad. It does not matter what you feel
because feelings always change on their own. You are not in control of them.
To accept the impersonality of the
mind is a great blessing because it sets you free and allows you to change your
relationship to the mind, not the mind itself.
When you have shifted from someone who is dissatisfied with the mind and
who wants to change it to a whole hearted acceptance of the mind as it is, you
feel confident to deal with the experiences it generates and your reactions to
them. It is no longer an enemy. You
don’t move toward anything, nor do you run away from anything.
I think the absence of this feeling
of confidence is what you mean when you suggest that the ‘full conviction’ is
not there. If this is so, then on the
other side of the mind there is a belief that something might happen in this
world that would make you supremely happy or set you free. So you keep hoping, paying attention to
what’s happening in your life looking for the magic to appear.
When dispassion happens
understanding is possible. But until it
is there, the unfulfilled part of you will not be able to accept the fact that
you are whole and complete. Vedanta is
not saying that you will ‘become’ whole and complete. It says that you are whole and complete
already, even when you think you aren’t, and that all is required is to remove
the belief that you are limited and incomplete.
This is why it often says in the scriptures that enlightenment is very
easy. But it also says that it is very
difficult…if you have not developed this dispassion.
Let’s look at it another way on a
more subtle level. You say “I would not
indulge anymore in any thoughts.’
Why? What power do the thoughts
have to compromise your happiness? The
thoughts don’t think you. You are the
thinker of the thoughts. So they depend
on you, not you on them. Therefore you
are free of them. If you feel that you
need to be free of the thoughts before you will be happy, I think the only way
you are going to attain that state is to physically die. I’ve met more than one hundred enlightened
people in my life and I never met one who didn’t think. The Self, the I, is
the watcher of the thoughts. You cannot
be what you see, at least on the relative plane. So there is a built in gap between you and
the thoughts. You can journey across it
from your side and identify with the thought if you wish, but no thought ever
made the journey across the gap to visit you.
If you inquire in this way you will see that you are already free.
Finally, let’s look at the idea of
enlightenment as ‘a felt experience.’
The reason it needn’t be ‘a felt experience is that you already have all
the Self experience you need. If this is
a non-dual universe made up of nothing but Consciousness…you…then everything
you are experiencing every minute is the Self: the food you eat, the air, your
wife and kids, the thoughts and feelings in your mind…literally every thing and
the experience of everything. Perhaps
you believe that enlightenment puts you in some special ‘state’ where you no
longer see the world around and have to deal with it? But if you are enlightened you would continue
to experience the same things you are experiencing now. You have to feed the dog, love your wife and
kids and pay the bills. But…and this is
the important part…because you know that it is all you, you are not
dissatisfied with it.
Peter: I need help in this area. I feel ashamed to show some "missing
links" when on the other side everything is so clear.
Ram:
Well, it is to your credit that you can discuss your ‘missing
links.’ How are they going to get
resolved unless you can see them differently…from the Self’s perspective? You are the Self. This is a fact. But the mind does not seem to want to be
it. So the understanding that lies
behind the mind has to be changed.
One’s ideas that are not in harmony with the truth of oneself need to be
changed. The ideas that are simply
incorrect need to be dropped. It is only
the incorrect notions one has about oneself and the world
that create dissatisfaction with what is. The guru is just someone who helps you get
your thinking straight. He or she is
the Self and knows it, so his or her mind ‘thinks from the Self.” By communicating with such a person you
learn how to think about yourself correctly.
You learn to identify erroneous beliefs and opinions and, most
importantly you learn that you can live happily without them. You see in front of you someone who thinks
clearly and hangs on to nothing. So you
get confidence, the full conviction, that you can also do this. It is generally more difficult the longer one
has been in the spiritual world because one picks up a lot of ‘spiritual’ ideas
that seem to be much more useful than the worldly ideas. So the person develops a kind of ‘spiritual’
identity. But this identity is just an
overlay, another ‘better’ ego on top of the existing ego. The Buddha’s Diamond Sutra was addressed to
monks who had been on the path for a long time and who had picked up a lot of
erroneous notions. The ‘diamond’ was
the teachings meant to cut through these spiritual myths.
To examine one’s erroneous notions
takes an open mind…which you seem to have.
Many years ago I had an ashram in
Anyway, things here are just the
same as when we last spoke and I am just the same as I’ve been forever so there
is nothing much to say beyond this. I
hope your business thrives and the situation at home improves. It’s a great pleasure to receive your e-mails
and to communicate with you. Much love.
Ram