Bettina: a sadhana feels too much of doing.
Ram:
Yes, precisely. The mind is the
Self but the Self is not the mind.
However, if you are going to continue to teach it is wise to continue to
do sadhana for anta karana suddhi, purification of the mind. Although it doesn’t matter to you, the ‘I,’
what condition the mind is in, the mind is the instrument through which people
contact you and its condition affects how they see and understand you…at least
until knowledge takes place.
Bettina: I used to read a weekly newspaper and some
novels, but at the moment i just read my two "bibles", ram ram and
shuddhanandas "path to the pathless" on the tattva bodha. wonderfull. clear and precise.
Ram:
This is important. Shankar and
others make it very clear that one should continue to refine and purify one’s understanding once knowledge has taken place. The richer and deeper and more multifaceted one’s understanding the more effective one is in awakening
and permanently enlightening others. I
don’t read or study texts anymore, not just because I am the texts, but because
I know every idea from every possible angle.
This came not from any ‘intuitive’ grasping but from careful patient
study over a long period of time. If
you are going to lose yourself in emptiness and cut all contact with the world
this is not necessary but if you are going to continue to help others it is
definitely useful, although, as you know, it is entirely elective…since you are
completely free.
It is always useful to know the
meaning of words so I would be interested to know what you mean by
‘meditation.’ Do you see it as
something other than contemplation, inquiry?
Is it an indrawn inward turned sattvic mind? Or is it simply seeing from the Self?
Bettina: i appreciate very much what you say about
impersonal texts. i do need personal explanations and
find your satsangs extremely useful as your answers refers to frequently asked
questions of any seeker and address very precisely points of misunderstanding
and doubt.
Ram:
It is in this spirit that I offer the comments above. My view is that when the Self functions as
guru its primary duty is to tailor the teaching to the doubt, not to offer
generic advice, like “you are just identified with your ego”, or “stop
thinking,” or to make statements about an ego’s supposed ‘state,’ etc.
Anyway, thank you so much for the
nice letter. I am very happy to meet you
in cyberspace and to communicate with you… and I accept and appreciate all the
affection that the words convey.
Love,
Ram